Tuesday, April 04, 2006

Do Not Buy Anything from Fraudster Kevin Trudeau

FACT
Kevin Trudeau is a quack

Some blunt consumer advice: Don't buy Kevin Trudeau's new book "Natural Cures 'They' Don't Want You to Know." It's not even the fact that he has a criminal history as a con artist, but the fact that he is an obvious quack right now! Trudeau fails to substantiate his medical claims with logic, evidence, and references and has no medical expertise. His website offers overpriced rehashed information that is widely available free of charge. The book comes with a CD on "How to lose 30 pounds in 30 days." That is dangerous! You should lose no more than 1-2 lbs. per week. It is an established fact that Trudeau hired people to give his book positive reviews on Amazon. [1] There are false claims about how to cure cancer based on bogus chemistry. If you bought this book, get a refund!

[1] Please check out my reviews on Amazon and leave constructive feedback. My review for David Ray Griffin's "9/11: The New Pearl Harbor" at the time of this writing has 8 "helpful" votes out of 58 total; this is the ridiculous work of conspiracist trolls--and that's no conspiracy theory :-). If you read it please vote "helpful" if you care about the truth behind 9/11: that it was NOT a USA government conspiracy.







2 comments:

Eric said...

The reason you have so many unhelpful hits on Amazon regarding your review of The New Pearl Harbor is because your review didn't answer or clarify the numerous questions surrounding 9/11. Accusing the United States government -- or just a rogue element within it -- sounds ridiculous to most people on the surface, but once we go over the each and every detail of 9/11 serious problems emerge.

Let's take the collapse of WTC7. The collapse of the tower is consistent with a controlled demolition and Larry Silverstein's peculiar comment that he made decision to "pull it," gives the idea even more credence. If fire was responsible for the collapse of WTC7 then it should be possible to show other examples of fire destorying a similar building in a similar manner. If you have any examples please cite them. However, the collapse of WTC7 is perfectly consistent with a controlled demolition. So in this circumstance the "conspiracy theory," is simply on the side of science and not the mainstrtam version of events. Perhaps if your "review" answered or clarified just this issue or any other issue surrounding 9/11, then perhaps you would earn more helpful votes.

Will Huysman said...

Eric, thank you for this great suggestion! I will soon add to the review, refuting the no-757, demolition, living hijackers, etc. theories.